Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMarquardt, Lynn Anne
dc.contributor.authorCraven, Alexander R.
dc.contributor.authorHugdahl, Kenneth Jan
dc.contributor.authorJohnsen, Erik
dc.contributor.authorKroken, Rune Andreas
dc.contributor.authorKusztrits, Isabella
dc.contributor.authorSpecht, Karsten
dc.contributor.authorThomassen, Anne Synnøve
dc.contributor.authorWeber, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorHirnstein, Marco
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-01T07:16:39Z
dc.date.available2023-03-01T07:16:39Z
dc.date.created2022-10-19T10:13:19Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationBrain Sci. 2022, 12(10), 1382.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2076-3425
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3054808
dc.description.abstractTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is used as treatment for auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH). The theory behind the treatment is that tDCS increases activity in prefrontal cognitive control areas, which are assumed to be hypoactive, and simultaneously decreases activity in temporal speech perception areas, which are assumed to be hyperactive during AVH. We tested this hypofrontal/hypertemporal reversal theory by investigating anatomical, neurotransmitter, brain activity, and network connectivity changes over the course of tDCS treatment. Methods: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted with 21 patients receiving either sham or real tDCS treatment (2 mA) twice daily for 5 days. The anode was placed over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the cathode over the left temporo-parietal cortex (TPC). Multimodal neuroimaging as well as clinical and neurocognitive functioning assessment were performed before, immediately after, and three months after treatment. Results: We found a small reduction in AVH severity in the real tDCS group, but no corresponding neuroimaging changes in either DLPFCD or TPC. Limitations: The study has a small sample size. Conclusion: The results suggest that the currently leading theory behind tDCS treatment of AVH may need to be revised, if confirmed by studies with larger N. Tentative findings point to the involvement of Broca’s area as a critical structure for tDCS treatment.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjecttranscranial direct current stimulationen_US
dc.subjecttDCSen_US
dc.subjectauditory hallucinationsen_US
dc.subjecthørselshallusinasjoneren_US
dc.subjecttranskranial likestrømstimuleringen_US
dc.subjectschizophreniaen_US
dc.subjectschizofrenien_US
dc.titlePilot-RCT Finds No Evidence for Modulation of Neuronal Networks of Auditory Hallucinations by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulationen_US
dc.title.alternativePilot-RCT Finds No Evidence for Modulation of Neuronal Networks of Auditory Hallucinations by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulationen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume12en_US
dc.source.journalBrain Sciencesen_US
dc.source.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/brainsci12101382
dc.identifier.cristin2062633
dc.source.articlenumber1382en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal