dc.contributor.author | Bubikova-Moan, Jarmila | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-10T08:42:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-10T08:42:18Z | |
dc.date.created | 2020-06-08T17:37:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2371-8323 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3057540 | |
dc.description.abstract | Building on a view of both narration and argumentation as dynamic concepts, the aim of this paper is to argue that story credibility remains a core issue in the debate on the argumentative quality of narratives, yet one that the dynamic perspective has not interrogated in sufficient detail. To illustrate, I will draw on empirical examples from research interviews with adult migrants to Norway on their learning and using Norwegian as a second language. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.uri | https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA12/Thursday/5/ | |
dc.subject | immigrants | en_US |
dc.subject | language learning | en_US |
dc.subject | Norway | en_US |
dc.subject | discourse analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | innvandrere | en_US |
dc.subject | Norge | en_US |
dc.subject | språklæring | en_US |
dc.subject | credibility | en_US |
dc.subject | troverdighet | en_US |
dc.subject | diskursanalyse | en_US |
dc.title | Unpacking the narrative-argumentative conundrum: story credibility revisited | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.subject.nsi | VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200 | en_US |
dc.subject.nsi | VDP::Social sciences: 200 | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 12 | en_US |
dc.source.journal | Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1814434 | |
cristin.ispublished | false | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |