Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Montasir
dc.contributor.authorMuhoozi, Grace Kyamazima Mehangye
dc.contributor.authorAtukunda, Prudence
dc.contributor.authorWesterberg, Ane Cecilie
dc.contributor.authorIversen, Per Ole
dc.contributor.authorWangen, Knut Reidar
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-25T07:27:24Z
dc.date.available2023-08-25T07:27:24Z
dc.date.created2023-08-18T21:30:10Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationPLOS ONE. 2023, 18(8).en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3085725
dc.description.abstractInadequate nutrition and insufficient stimulation in early childhood can lead to long-term deficits in cognitive and social development. Evidence for policy and decision-making regarding the cost of delivering nutrition education is lacking in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). In rural Uganda, we conducted a cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT) examining the effect of a maternal nutrition education intervention on developmental outcomes among children aged 6–8 months. This intervention led to significantly improved cognitive scores when the children reached the age of 20–24 months. When considering the potential for this intervention’s future implementation, the desired effects should be weighed against the increased costs. This study therefore aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of this education intervention compared with current practice. Health outcome data were based on the RCT. Cost data were initially identified by reviewing publications from the RCT, while more detailed information was obtained by interviewing researchers involved in processing the intervention. This study considered a healthcare provider perspective for an 18-months’ time horizon. The control group was considered as the current practice for the future large-scale implementation of this intervention. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed, including calculations of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). In addition, uncertainty in the results was characterized using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. The ICER for the education intervention compared with current practice was USD ($) 16.50 per cognitive composite score gained, with an incremental cost of $265.79 and an incremental cognitive composite score of 16.11. The sensitivity analyses indicated the robustness of these results. The ICER was sensitive to changes in cognitive composite score and the cost of personnel. The education intervention can be considered cost-effective compared with the current practice. The outcome of this study, including the cost analysis, health outcome, cost-effectiveness, and sensitivity analysis, can be useful to inform policymakers and stakeholders about effective resource allocation processes in Uganda and possibly other LMIC.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectcognitive developmenten_US
dc.subjectnutritionen_US
dc.subjectcost-effectiveen_US
dc.subjectnutrition education interventionen_US
dc.subjectinterventionen_US
dc.titleCognitive development among children in a low-income setting: Cost-effectiveness analysis of a maternal nutrition education intervention in rural Ugandaen_US
dc.title.alternativeCognitive development among children in a low-income setting: Cost-effectiveness analysis of a maternal nutrition education intervention in rural Ugandaen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume18en_US
dc.source.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.source.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290379
dc.identifier.cristin2168069
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal